Skip to Content

Einhorn, Barbarito, Frost, Botwinick, Nunn & Musmanno, PC | The contents of this website contain attorney advertising. | Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Articles

Related Practice: Appellate Practice

Test

NJ Supreme Court Affirms Appellate Division Decision and Protects Injured Employee and Medical Providers As discussed in my prior blog on the matter of The Plastic Surgery Center v. Malouf Chevrolet-Cadillac, 457 N.J. Super. 565 (App. Div. 2019), the Appellate Division held that a six-year statute of limitations, rather than […]

The court determined that the RRAS is an appropriate tool to help assess the risk of re-offense for sex offenders who are convicted of one offense for possession or distribution of child pornography. In In the Matter of Registrant J.G., a published Appellate Division decision from April 13, 2020, the […]

On December 31, 2019, the Appellate Division in Jackson v. Shop Rite of Ewing, (A-3267-18T2), an unpublished opinion, affirmed the decision of the trial court in Mercer County granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of lack of notice. In this case, plaintiff Beverly Jackson was a customer […]

Contact us to schedule a consultation or
call now to speak with an attorney 973-627-7300